AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Litemanager pro 4.89/2/2023 ![]() It is possible to hack Home editions of windows to permit Remote desktop terminal services to work as if it was a terminal server and allow simultanious multi-user logins using remote desktop protocol. but I think you'll find that when you are being assisted remotely both the localy logged in user and the remote assistor can see and control the same desktop but with Remote Desktop only the person logged in remotely sees the desktop and it cannot be seen by a locally logged in user AND the remote logged in user at the same time. Never having used remote assistance because I've never needed to ask anyone for it. While remote desktop is intended to be a business edition and up feature and is not available on home targeted editions of windows. Remote Assistance is just that and is available on all issues of windows versions that support the technology home, basic business and ultimate. Kjoh18,Microsoft remote desktop does NOT require enabling remote assistance to function as designed they are two different products. I really appreciate and feel for you that you are working sincerely and diligently to only provide the features and benefits you claim, and to make them competitive and superior, but you have a Putin problem - we have a T-Rump problem, and evidence is revealing that they are one and the same, so I know you say "no politics, please" but politics is unavoidable. ![]() Thank you for sharing that your software can use ports rather then IP ( which you call NOIP rather tn NoIP or Ports ): TeamViewer functions for repeated 5 minute sessions with a delay between when commercial use is suspected but a commercial license is not engaged, enough time to initiate and check in later for a variety of remote tasks, effective and functional on unattended remote computers, but interruptive of a continuous experience with an end user sitting and waiting for the next instruction or action. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |